Is the 2020 Acura MDX a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
7thof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 43.4 cu ft.
- 7th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (4th of 24), cargo (7th of 24).
- Weakest: towing (10th of 24, tied with 10).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $44,500 | 15th of 24 | 35% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 4th of 24 | 78% | |
| Most horsepower | 321 hp | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 43.4 cu ft | 7th of 24 | 70% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.5 in | 15th of 23 | 32% | |
| Max towing | 5,000 lb | 10th of 24 | 17% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 47.7 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 47.0 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 46.0 cu ft
- Acura MDX 43.4 cu ft
- Acura MDX Sport Hybrid 43.4 cu ft
Show all 24
- Land Rover Discovery 41.2 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport 40.3 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 34.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 34.0 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Nissan Murano 32.1 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Lexus RX 23.0 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 21.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 18.0 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.2 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 16.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
- Lexus GX 11.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree